doctrinal legal research


On the basis that all research on law necessarily acknowledges the law as its basis then the answer to that must be a resounding yes. 3, at 17 [54]. This entire group of articles had been published in refereed (blind peer reviewed) journals. (Bouchrika 2021) The two words method and methodology should not be used interchangeably. [2] Doctrinal research is a study of constitutional principles, i.e., "It inquires about what the rule is on a specific subject." The doctrinal legal research is thus arbitrary in nature. Law, considered as a science, consists of certain principles or doctrines. The tendency of consumers not to read the standard form contract, The inability of consumers to evaluate the terms of the contract correctly once they do read. In this transitional time, legal academics are increasingly infusing evidence (and methods) from other disciplines into their reasoning to bolster their reform recommendations. The most popular approach used by law researchers for doctrinal research is library-based analysis. Both forms of legal research have their own share of advantages and disadvantages. Legal issues are better analyzed when studied in a comprehensive manner by taking into consideration all the factors that might affect it. This forms part of the context of the doctrinal discussion.Many of the articles (twenty-three) include recommendations for reforming the law informed by the evidence presented. and study their relationship by data collected, which could be qualitative or quantitative. The research basically means searching for something again and again until we reach an unequivocal conclusion. Searching for reliable and accurate sources demands time and effort. Law Librarians, Law Libraries and Legal Research in the Post-Internet Era, 106(4) Law Library Journal 579, at 584 (2014). unilateral doctrine routledge acts the society. M. Kirby, Are We There Yet?, in B. Opeskin and D. Weisbrot (eds. While in normal circumstances the same law might have been proved very useful for the economy. Studies including details of the empirical analysis are diverted to the criminology and social science journals.Undoubtedly law academics use a similar approach for publishing outputs from their larger funded and team-based projects. 13 B. Kimball, The Inception of Modern Professional Education: C.C. There may be clear explanations for this. The submissions are often divided as to their arguments and proposals for the most advantageous way forward. It may not be wrong to say that the amorphous mass of the present-day statutory provisions takes concrete shape and form in the great laboratories of the law courts. Hence it is also called empirical research. Without the right direction, it may become highly objective and too mechanical. primary sources as well in the secondary sources. This stage usually entails a lot of background reading on a topic, including dictionaries, encyclopedias, fundamental textbooks, treatises, and journals with footnotes. These were located on the AustLII database using the search term crim* w/10 (reform* OR recommend*) within the Australian journal titles published in 2013. [3]Singhal, Ashish Kumar & Malik, Ikramuddin (2012). Possibly because of this high level of scrutiny, the Commissions Annual Reports contain very detailed information on performance and outcomes.44x Australian Law Reform Commission, Report 125: Annual Report 2013-13 (2014), at 26. Hurlburt, The Origins and Nature of Law Reform Commissions in the Canadian Provinces: A Reply to Recommissioning Law Reform by Professor R.A. Macdonald, 35, R. Greycar and J. Morgan, Law Reform: Whats in It for Women?, 23, A. Melville, Conducting Law Reform Research: A Comparative Perspective, 28(2). For example, if the government decides to bring umbrella legislation for all the crimes committed against women, it may initiate doctrinal research by some jurists and experts in the field. What's critical is that researchers aim to prepare themselves with the expertise they'll need to achieve their research goals effectively.

Therefore, doctrinal research being the traditional methodology has helped in the development of legal research by giving it a base. For example, an investigation can be conducted to find specific legislation that monitors occurrences of child abuse in a particular jurisdiction. J. Jones, Undergraduate Students and Research, in O. Zuber-Skerritt (ed.). At a similar time, the law had entered the academic field in Europe and doctrinal research picked up pace as it became a popular tool of academic legal research. It is widely recognised that comparative research approaches are becoming the norm within the current doctrinal method, and this small snapshot of articles reinforces this perspective. The use of additional interdisciplinary methods is dependent on government budgets. Unless scholars are very familiar with doctrinal method limits, study findings can be "too academic, too analytical, unquestioning, conservative, irrelevant and without proper regard to the cultural, economic and political relevance of a legal procedure.". Law Librarians, Law Libraries and Legal Research in the Post-Internet Era, 106(4).

The advantages of non-doctrinal research are many but the prime one remains its utility in practical purposes. The purpose of non-doctrinal research is to check the utility of a law that has been brought or how it impacts the non-legal aspects of society. 33 M. Brown, G. Lansdell, B. Saunders & A. Eriksson, Im Sorry But Youre Just Not That Special Reflecting on the Special Circumstances Provisions of the Infringement Act 2006 (Vic), 24(3) Current Issues in Criminal Justice 375 (2013) (semi-structured interviewing and court observations and quantitative, descriptive data extracted from CLC databases); H. Douglas and R. Fitzgerald, Legal Processes and Gendered Violence: Cross-Applications for Domestic Violence Protection Orders, 36(1) University of New South Wales Law Journal 56 (2013) (examination of Magistrates Court files). So in Tranters study, citations to secondary academic material in the form of books, journal articles and conference papers were quite low at only 6% of the total citations.62x Ibid. These are policy research and comparative research. This subset included articles which were written by lawyers, included doctrinal analysis, and specifically dealt with criminal law and reform. Other commissions were more interested in broader questions presenting papers in open academic conferences prior to the reports being published so as to engage with stakeholders, and commissioning private empirical studies prior to writing the reports.However, this article is examining the extent of interdisciplinarity and the use of non-doctrinal methodologies by lawyers to reform the law. And. As this analysis continues, it is further refined as they decide where, how, and what to search. (2009), [2] See, http://www.studymode.com/essays/Significance-And-Relevancy-OfDoctrinal-Research-55442354.html dated. Thirdly it focuses on the law reform commissions, those independent government committees that play such an important role in law reform in common law jurisdictions.This examination demonstrates that while the doctrinal core of legal scholarship survives intact, legal scholars are, to some extent, endeavouring to accommodate statistics, comparative perspectives, social science evidence and methods, and theoretical analysis, within the legal research framework, in order to provide additional ballast to the recommendations for reform. 47 L. Barnett, The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success, 39 Federal Law Review 161 (2011). There are apparent differences in the level of complexity of the doctrinal legal study. But one must be very careful in the selection of these sources. 6 Pearce, Campbell & Harding, above n. 5, 2, 312 [9.17]. eighteen used statistics published elsewhere in discussing the basis of concerns. VAIDHA doesn't hold any liability arising out of this article. Langdell, 1826-1906 (2009), at 349, app., 2. It is also known as a "trivial doctrinal examination" cause sometimes it is done without proper understanding of the legal system's social, financial, and political significance.[3]. Doctrinal research provides the instruments required in the legal judgment for attorneys, judges, and others. 20 D. Weisbrot, The Future for Institutional Law Reform, in B. Opeskin and D. Weisbrot (eds. It might be expected that more non-doctrinal methods would be found in studies of criminal law and law reform. The emphasis always lies on the primary materials the legislation and case law. Pearce, Campbell & Harding, above n. 5, 2, at 310 [9.12]. When book reviews, speeches, and government publications were omitted, then only thirty-two refereed journal articles remained as a relevant subset of the database.32x These were located on the AustLII database using the search term crim* w/10 (reform* OR recommend*) within the Australian journal titles published in 2013. view the economist or linguist or criminologist. As it is well known, this is purely theoretical research that consists of either simple research aimed at finding a specific statement of the law, or it is legal analysis with more complex logic and depth. Did the author mention law reform commission recommendations?All the articles used a doctrinal research methodology to some extent. The theoretical framework of the project will be emphasised for a law and society or sociology journal. It was felt that legal research should deal more with its practical application and how it functions and affects the life of people in real-world; and less with the theoretical aspect of studying written law. It is socio-legal research. Many variables exert their influence to cause this transformation. However, these methodological constraints were perceived as a failing in the Canadian Arthurs Report which held that the basic problem with much law reform research is rather that it is located toward the doctrinal end of the methodological spectrum, and consequently fails to confront most problematic issues.54x Arthurs, above n. 5, at 70. It has also helped in pointing out the loopholes in existing laws and statutes. In the United Kingdom, the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission are statutory commissions established by the Law Commissions Act 1965 (UK); The United States has multiple committees or commissions, for example, The California Law Revision Commission and the Michigan Law Revision Committee. It has been a close companion of law academicians, students, judges, advocates and jurists. Laws are there to fulfil societys needs. Basically, we take a legal variable which could be a law along with a non-legal variable like economic, social, political, etc. Often, the combination of different methods of Legal Research, i.e., a mixed-method using ideological, social, and legal, can work together to achieve a better understanding of the law. The Library is to us what a laboratory is to the chemist or the physicist, and what a museum is to the naturalist.15x C.C. These steps include examining legal issues to decide if more study is needed. Evidence exists of law reform commissions in Scotland in 1425 and various ad hoc committees set up to reform and rationalise the law over the centuries in England,36x W. Hurlburt, Law Reform Commissions in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada (1986), at Chapter 2 Law Reform Commissions in the United Kingdom 15-99 generally. 57 A. Melville, Conducting Law Reform Research: A Comparative Perspective, 28(2) Zeitschrift fr Rechtssoziologie 153 (2007), at 153. But non-doctrinal research studies law in connection with society and various non-legal aspects that affect the law. In 2006, Martha Minow, Dean of Harvard Law School, identifies doctrinal restatement as one of the main contributions legal scholars make within their research.8x M. Minow, Archetypal Legal Scholarship A Field Guide, 63(1) Journal of Legal Education 65-69, at 65 (2013). Can fundamental research include a doctrinal component?

21 Pearce, Campbell & Harding, above n. 5, 3, app. Availability of funds poses another challenge. But very rarely is new data compiled from within the commissions. They may have to go through all the existing laws in this field, previous case laws, precedents, international trends, legal commentaries, articles by scholars, dictionaries, encyclopedias, journals, treatises, textbooks and other sources of legal information. In the United Kingdom, the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission are statutory commissions established by the Law Commissions Act 1965 (UK); The United States has multiple committees or commissions, for example, The California Law Revision Commission and the Michigan Law Revision Committee. D. Weisbrot, The Future for Institutional Law Reform, in B. Opeskin and D. Weisbrot (eds.). Until this occurs, it should be queried whether the low level of citation of secondary material truly reflects the background research undertaken for the reports.A more worrying aspect of the research is the apparent lack of reference in the reports to empirical studies. Who are experienced in the legal field and have had helpedand are helping future lawyers and advocates Doctrinal research is described as a research method that is often considered as "normal judicial research. According to this study, 16 of the 60 theses examined include a chapter to describe the use of non-doctrinal methodologies, 21 theses discuss methodologies as part of another chapter, and one deals with the methodology in an appendix.

Firstly the article reviews studies on the extent of methodologies and reformist frameworks in PhD research in Australia. Theory is also increasingly used as a vehicle for critiquing and analysing the basis of the black letter law. There are other aspects to the paradigm the once-prevalent view of law as being objective and neutral, and positivism, with its view of law as being what is rather than what could be or should be also form part of the paradigm. ), Investing in Social Capital (2002), at 152 on breakdown of empirical and doctrinal PhDs in Australia. While only two of the articles were reporting that the authors had themselves undertaken surveys, interviews, or statistical projects,33x M. Brown, G. Lansdell, B. Saunders & A. Eriksson, Im Sorry But Youre Just Not That Special Reflecting on the Special Circumstances Provisions of the Infringement Act 2006 (Vic), 24(3) Current Issues in Criminal Justice 375 (2013) (semi-structured interviewing and court observations and quantitative, descriptive data extracted from CLC databases); H. Douglas and R. Fitzgerald, Legal Processes and Gendered Violence: Cross-Applications for Domestic Violence Protection Orders, 36(1) University of New South Wales Law Journal 56 (2013) (examination of Magistrates Court files). These tools include descriptions of terms that assist the researcher in comprehending and outlining the legal concepts at work in the area of law under consideration. 38 There are Law Reform Commissions in most of the Australian jurisdictions. It is more concerned with social values. Its area of focus is how the law works in the real world. But it is not possible without any data that reveals the actual circumstances of society. In the first instance, the method of doctrinal research often used by students and professionals is unsuitable. By and large the law reform commissions fall within the latter community engagement category. What is current practice and how valid are the outcomes or any recommendations for change based on the studies? The purpose and philosophy of doctrinal study must be the same as that of law studies: the application of laws in social engineering. 48 Tranter, above n. 1; Barnett, above n. 46. The normative character of doctrinal research in particular contexts, is concerned with the discovery and development of legal doctrines and research, for publication in textbooks and journals that take the form of asking the question, What is the law?.

To view or add a comment, sign in. That means, the legal doctrine would include legal principles and tenets that would govern the legal world.

Most often, the starting point in any research is doctrinal, i.e. different modes of experimentation and observation like collecting data by means of case studies, questionnaires, surveys, etc. Is this fundamentally changing the doctrinal method? Availability and choice of right and reliable sources is the bottleneck in doctrinal research. 3 at 17 [53]. Langdell, 1826-1906 (2009), at 349, app., 2. The following points answer the question why doctrinal research is essential in law. It also helps Clientsfind a lawyer. Macdonald advocated that law reform should be focusing on alternative reform processes (and outcomes) rather than simply presenting a report together with redrafted legislation as a standard response, and that there should be a different choice of projects moving away from substantive law topics to broader areas of social justice and the relation of law and society.52x Ibid., at 875. 9 S. Bartie, The Lingering Core of Legal Scholarship, 30(3) Legal Studies 345, at 350 (2010). Where a comparison was included, the study considered whether this was contextual or a full comparison and whether there was also reference to public international law. In all these stages, secondary sources talked about in the above paragraphs are utilized. Also, collecting primary data about some sensitive issues can be a dangerous task for the researcher. Sometimes, a very comprehensive law is brought but sometimes the environment is such that its effectiveness is shielded by those circumstances.

The essential features of doctrinal scholarship involve a critical conceptual analysis of all relevant legislation and case law to reveal a statement of the law relevant to the matter under investigation.2x T. Hutchinson, Val Bunny Watson? Globalisation and technology mean that the wider legal sphere is more accessible and pertinent for the legal scholar. The doctrine of precedents also developed around the same time. Doctrinal research has the root word doctrine which means a principle or a basic governing tenet. Law students at the graduate and post-graduate levels usually venture into the world of legal research with the help of doctrinal methodology. Doctrinal and Non-Doctrinal Research ., Salim Ibrahim Ali, Dr. Zuryati Muhammad Yusoff, Dr. Zainil Amin Ayub. These are discussed at more length later in this article. (Tiwary 2020) This is the reason why doctrinal research is also known as traditional research. Law transforms to a certain extent when it comes to implementation. For example, for a provision of the constitution, Constituent Assembly Debates could give great insight. This issue requires further research.To what extent do the law reform commissions have recourse to academic material on the issues they are studying? Definite inroads have been made in relation to the use of comparative approaches. Nevertheless, legal academic success has been measured within a doctrinal methodology framework, which includes the tracing of legal precedent and legislative interpretation. Therefore, they cannot be studied in isolation and must be developed as per societys requirements. A survey of postgraduate research in Australian law schools undertaken in 2002 demonstrated that only 20% of all doctoral research projects could be described as purely doctrinal.29x D. Manderson and R. Mohr, From Oxymoron to Intersection: An Epidemiology of Legal Research, 6 Law Text Culture 159, at 164 (2003); and see D. Manderson, Law: The Search for Community, in S. Marginson (ed. It is a compass that determines the direction of the research. Doctrinal research is based on secondary sources of information, like articles, commentaries, textbooks, etc. In 1987, the Australian Pearce Committee highlighted doctrinal as the main category in its research taxonomy, describing it as research which provides a systematic exposition of the rules governing a particular legal category, analyses the relationship between rules, explains areas of difficulty and, perhaps, predicts future developments.6x Pearce, Campbell & Harding, above n. 5, 2, 312 [9.17]. Students ofLawsikho coursesregularly produce writing assignments and work on practical exercises as a part of their coursework and develop themselves in real-life practical skills. The roots of doctrinal research can be traced to the positivist or the analytical school of law which was objective and value-free. There is evidence of a broadening of the method overall, but we need a more sophisticated study of larger amounts of data to verify the trends observed so far. Copyright 2016, All Rights Reserved. Here, we are basically checking the validity of existing laws in light of a changing society. 49 Justice Kirby has concluded that the most original value added of the ALRC and its chief contribution to the law reform technique in the years after its establishment was its emphasis on public consultation. In this background, there was a huge lift received by non-doctrinal research that helped in this direction. See, for example, E. Jones, Some Current Trends in Legal Research, 15(2) Journal of Legal Education 121 (1962-1963). 2 T. Hutchinson, Val Bunny Watson? ), The Promise of Law Reform (2005), at 160. L. Barnett, The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success, 39. The non-doctrinal approach allows the researcher to conduct research that analyses the law from the perspective of other scientific disciplines, and to employ those disciplines in drafting the law. Broadly speaking, different topics will be packaged for the various audiences to best disseminate the research amongst the assorted discipline audiences. ), Linking Legal Scenarios to Empirical Data, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. The essence of law; ideas behind is specific whether substantive fields of law, such as civil law, criminal law, torts, or contract; political or the purpose of rights, obligation, responsibility, and justice, to name a few. ), The word doctrine refers to a set of beliefs. Melville noted the methodological insularity, top down approach and even paternalistic attitude exhibited by some commissions who confined the stakeholder list and limited the questions addressed to them.58x Ibid., at 158, 159. The permanent English Law Commission was established in 1965, and statutory law reform commissions on a similar model are now established in most common law jurisdictions.38x There are Law Reform Commissions in most of the Australian jurisdictions. Five of the articles simply critiqued the existing laws.Some of the limitations of this pilot study must be acknowledged openly. As is well known, this is theoretical research that consists of either basic research aimed at locating a particular legal argument or legal study with more nuanced reasoning and depth. A doctrinal analytical approach will concentrate on case law, legislation, and other legal documents. There are discrete comparisons of legal provisions in two or three jurisdictions, comparisons of the legislation between numbers of jurisdictions in order to provide context, and at the very least the use of comparative data and information on the law in other jurisdictions using secondary literature. As most legal researchers know, this is far more difficult than it sounds. The realist school of thought brings to the forefront, the concern that laws are made for the benefit and regulation of society. 30 T. Hutchinson and N. Duncan, Defining and Describing What We Do: Doctrinal Legal Research, 17(1) Deakin Law Review 83, at 99 (2012); The study of the Australasian Digital Thesis Program website was undertaken by Felicity Deane and Terry Hutchinson and completed in October 2010. 55 R. Greycar and J. Morgan, Law Reform: Whats in It for Women?, 23 Windsor Yearbook on Access to Justice 393 (2005).

These include parliamentary committees and ad hoc commissions of inquiry,47x L. Barnett, The Process of Law Reform: Conditions for Success, 39 Federal Law Review 161 (2011). The categories of methods the PhD students choose are constrained by the supervisors levels of expertise and the students training. The development of tort law is a prime example. You have successfully registered for the webinar. One of the main purposes of conducting doctrinal research is solving the legal problems of bringing laws. From this discussion it is evident that there is a need for a new interdisciplinary taxonomy that recognises the interplay of the changing methods and purposes within the legal discipline paradigm. Doctrinal or library-based research is the most common methodology employed by those undertaking research in law. 8 M. Minow, Archetypal Legal Scholarship A Field Guide, 63(1) Journal of Legal Education 65-69, at 65 (2013). It helps in gauging the practical effectiveness of laws in various non-legal fields. This stage often involves a great deal of background reading on a subject using sources such as dictionaries, encyclopedias, major textbooks, treatises, and journals that are accompanied by footnotes. Reform-oriented research recommends change. This conceptual analysis critique is based on an understanding of the rules of precedent between the court jurisdictions, the rules of statutory interpretation, the tacit discipline knowledge such as the difference between civil and criminal jurisdictions, and various tests of liability, along with the acknowledged reasoning methods, borrowed from philosophy and logic, such as induction and deduction.How does the doctrinal method relate to laws discipline paradigm? It is difficult to reduce to an algorithm. 60 R. Atkinson, Law Reform and Community Participation, in B. Opeskin and D. Weisbrot (eds.